I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Pick colors at any zoom level
。业内人士推荐heLLoword翻译官方下载作为进阶阅读
南方周末：你也说过，2015年17岁的你参加肖赛时，其实自己并没有准备好。如果现在的你可以给当时的自己一个建议，你会劝他不要参赛吗？
"Maternity and neonatal services in England are failing too many women, babies, families and staff," said Baroness Amos, who is leading a government-commissioned review (file photo)